Applicability assessment of multi-source soil moisture products in Yunnan Province
Article
Figures
Metrics
Preview PDF
Reference
Related
Cited by
Materials
Abstract:
Soil moisture is an important variable for vegetation growth, drought monitoring and agricultural water management, controlling water, energy and carbon exchange processes. Although traditionally observed soil moisture is highly accurate, it is difficult to obtain and spatially poorly representative; fortunately, with the development of satellites and reanalysis data, the difficulty of insufficient observed soil moisture data has been alleviated. As an indirect estimate of soil moisture, satellite and reanalysis data inevitably produce spatio-temporal systematic biases and random errors, especially in a region with complex climate and topography such as Yunnan Province, the applicability of these soil moisture products is still unclear, so it is necessary to assess the quality of these products.This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of five different soil moisture data in Yunnan Province and their performance under different wet and dry conditions, including ERA5-Land, GLDAS, SMAP, MERRA-2, and ESA CCI, were evaluated based on in-situ data and the triple-collocation (TC) in Yunnan Province. The results show that: (1) compared with the site data, the deviations of the five products were all positive (0.090-0.122), which significantly overestimated soil moisture in Yunnan Province, but the trends and magnitudes of the changes were consistent, and all of them were able to capture the temporal changes of soil moisture; (2) the assessment results based on the in-situ data showed that, on the yearly scale, ERA5-Land (0.456) and SMAP (0.454) matched the site data the highest, followed by ESA CCI (0.439); the assessment results of dry and wet seasons showed that all product correlations were lower than the annual scale, and the wet season was higher than the dry season, but the wet season showed a greater positive bias, with SMAP performing optimally in both the dry season (0.323) and the wet season (0.418); and (3) the results of the assessment based on the TC method showed that the correlations of ERA5-Land (0.925) and ESA CCI (0.931) had the highest correlation, followed by GLDAS (0.890) and MERRA-2 (0.864), the assessment results of the dry and wet seasons were consistent with the assessment of the site data, and the correlation of most of the products also showed a decreasing trend in comparison with the annual scale with a larger decrease in the dry season; and the R for SMAP dry and wet seasons were 0.828 and 0.770, respectively, which were the worst performers in both cases; The R (0.912) and ESD (0.020) of MERRA-2 in the wet season were better than its annual scale assessment. Taken together, ESA CCI has higher correlation and best accuracy, and is more suitable for monitoring surface soil moisture in Yunnan Province.The assessment results based on in-situ data and the TC method exhibited similarities but also differences. Both methods indicated that ERA5-Land and ESA CCI performed well across both assessments. Additionally, the performance of different products varied between the dry and wet seasons. However, there was a discrepancy in the performance of SMAP and MERRA-2 between the two assessment methods. In the site-based assessment, SMAP demonstrated high accuracy while MERRA-2 showed lower accuracy. Conversely, in the TC-based assessment, SMAP performed the poorest while MERRA-2 exhibited improved performance. Integrating both assessment methods enhanced our understanding of the accuracy and applicability of the different soil moisture products.